Another note about things I mean to write.
I finally saw "Apocalypse Now," and wonder why it and "Heart of Darkness" both seem so long to me. Sure the imagery is great, but is this some kind of weirder, darker "Gulliver's Travels" or "Pilgrim's Progress"? I feel as though some metaphor should snap into place, as though I've visited a series of stations by rote. I find them tiresome.
Charlie discovered his daughter's copy of "Heart of Darkness" a little bit ago, and now we both feel like we should read it. It's dense, and pretty, but I still don't know if I'm missing some compelling message, or if I've already seen it and wasn't impressed.
Having written a paper on it and received a D, I was told by my high school English teacher that I had "to admit it was an awful paper." I think I tore it into a million pieces. I'd never had the experience of not knowing what the hell was going on in a story SO MUCH that I could only get a D on an essay about it. So, let's see if utter bafflement gives way.
I finally saw "Apocalypse Now," and wonder why it and "Heart of Darkness" both seem so long to me. Sure the imagery is great, but is this some kind of weirder, darker "Gulliver's Travels" or "Pilgrim's Progress"? I feel as though some metaphor should snap into place, as though I've visited a series of stations by rote. I find them tiresome.
Charlie discovered his daughter's copy of "Heart of Darkness" a little bit ago, and now we both feel like we should read it. It's dense, and pretty, but I still don't know if I'm missing some compelling message, or if I've already seen it and wasn't impressed.
Having written a paper on it and received a D, I was told by my high school English teacher that I had "to admit it was an awful paper." I think I tore it into a million pieces. I'd never had the experience of not knowing what the hell was going on in a story SO MUCH that I could only get a D on an essay about it. So, let's see if utter bafflement gives way.